Crispin Blunt on the privatisation of the probation service: a change too soon?

Exclusive interview with the former prisons minister.

Source: Flickr, the conservative party

Former prison minister Crispin Blunt has said that probation reforms could potentially reduce reoffending and help addicts, but that the moves are too hasty and more pilot schemes are needed.

The Transforming Rehabilitation Act came into force in February this year and has caused quite a stir. The act privatised approximately 70 per cent of the probation service leaving only high risk offenders under the remit of the public sector. Chris Grayling has described the act as “a great step forwards”. However not everyone is quite so confident.

The Social Market Foundation, a think tank, published a paper in 2013 warning that the act would create “perverse incentives such that providers risk making losses if they seek to cut reoffending”. Concerns have also been raised that the reforms have been rushed through too fast and a system of payment by results will encourage companies to focus on easier cases, leaving the more complex offenders to suffer.

Interview with Crispin Blunt, former prisons minister

Mr Blunt recognises that a policy that incentivises results has the potential to be effective. “It plainly could be hugely empowering for probation offices if they are being paid not only to supervise a criminal sentence, but if they were also incentivised to make people better and stop them reoffending.”

“It plainly could be hugely empowering”

He is optimistic that the Act could mean better treatment for recovering drug addicts. “A lot of the minor theft offences occur because an addict leaves prison without support and is trying to feed their habit. This would be the sort of thing that would fall to the community rehabilitation centres (CRCs) to help with.”

He says the payment by result model should improve through-the-gate services and reduce reoffending. “The CRCs will have an interest in identifying addicts within prison and making sure that they begin their process of recovery and that it is sustained outside. And if they can sustain that then they should reduce the reoffending rate because if you remove the addiction often you remove the need to offend”.

“There’s no magic bullet with all of this”

However Mr Blunt and others have criticised the reforms as too hasty. “There’s no magic bullet with all of this, I am anxious that we’re moving too fast. I would have piloted two areas, but Chris Grayling is so convinced it is such a good thing that it should be done across the whole service and that we shouldn’t lose any time getting on with it.

“My anxiety would be that when mistakes are made, which they will be, that they will be played out across the whole country and that may discredit the whole process throwing it into reverse”.

“I am anxious that we’re moving too fast.”

When it comes to the CRCs picking off the easier cases and capitalising on ‘low hanging fruit,’ Mr Blunt is less concerned. “I am not too bothered about ‘collecting fruit’, as long as the overall effect is to drop the reoffending rate. If people are unbelievably difficult to address, and won’t cooperate, why waste resources on them? My concern is that the service hasn’t been piloted, we don’t yet know if it will drop the reoffending rate.”

.

For a full breakdown of the probation service in the run up to the Transforming Rehabilitation Act, check out our interactive timeline here. Keep an eye out, we’ve got more in store on the new probation service!

TWITTER: @prisonwatchuk
FACEBOOK: facebook.com/PrisonWatchUK

2 Comments on “Crispin Blunt on the privatisation of the probation service: a change too soon?”

  1. Absolute nonsense from Blunt what he calls the Transforming Rehabilitation Act Offender Rehabilitation Action Act 2014 is seriously flawed ins several ways that I am weary about writing about.

    I still predict it will end up as bad for those who supported it – Blunt was one – as was the Poll Tax, which led to riots and cost Thatcher her Prime Minster-ship.

    Though it seems because it was brought in much later than intended – 1st February 2015 (it is beginning to unravel) rather than last autumn – Cameron an Clegg will be gone before the worst is reported.

    Also because media and politicians generally have low understanding of criminal justice apart from using it to stir up fear and sales and votes, it may never be properly reported – like the disasters with Forensic Science Laboratory and interpreter outsourcing were not either.

    Like

  2. […] Critics warned the Act would create “perverse incentives such that providers risk making losses if they seek to cut reoffending”. Meanwhile women’s rehabilitation centres complained of severe funding cuts and a failure to tailor services to women as well as men. […]

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s